ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: We aimed to research that naringin whether protects from renal ischemia/reperfusion induced renal damage in rats. Methods: Twenty-four Wistar albino female rats randomly were divided into three groups: 1) control group, in which the rats were only performed right nephrectomy; 2) a second group received right nephrectomy and left kidney ischemia (1 h) and reperfusion (24 h) group ischemia/reperfusion (I/R); 3) a third group received 50 mg/kg naringin orally once a day for two weeks before ischemia/reperfusion (I/R/N). Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), caspase-3, B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2 associated x protein (Bax), serum creatinine (Cr), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Naringin-treated rats that performed renal ischemia/reperfusion demonstrated significant decrease in Cr, IL-6 and TNF-α levels when compared to the only renal ischemia/reperfusion performed rats. While renal ischemia/reperfusion caused a decrease of bcl-2 (1.72 ± 0.20 pg/ml) levels, while an increase of COX-2 (11882 ± 642 pg/ml), cPLA2 (2448 ± 139 pg/ml), iNOS (4331 ± 438 IU/ml), cleaved caspase-3 (7.33 ± 0.76 ng/ml) and Bax (2.33 ± 0.44 ng/ml) levels. The treatment of naringin reversed these kidney effects (7.47 ± 60.35 pg/ml; 9299 ± 327 pg/ml; 2001 ± 78 pg/ml; 3112 ± 220 IU/ml; 3.38 ± 0.54 ng/ml; 2.33 ± 0.44 ng/ml, respectively) (p <0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that naringin treatment attenuated renal damage induced by ischemia/reperfusion in rats.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Nuestro objetivo fue investigar si la naringina protege del daño en los riñones provocado por isquemia-reperfusión renal en ratas. Material y métodos: De forma aleatoria, dividimos 24 ratas albinas Wistar hembras en tres grupos: 1) grupo control, en el que solo se les realizó a las ratas una nefrectomía derecha; 2) un segundo grupo isquemia-reperfusión, con nefrectomía derecha e isquemia de riñón izquierdo (1 h) y reperfusión (24 h); 3) un tercer grupo al que se le administró 50 mg/kg de naringina por vía oral una vez al día durante dos semanas antes de la isquemia-reperfusión. Por medio de un ensayo inmunoabsorbente ligado a enzimas (ELISA), se midieron las siguientes expresiones: ciclooxigenasa-2 (COX-2), fosfolipasa citosólica A2 (cPLA2), óxido nítrico sintetasa inducible (ONSi), caspasa-3, linfoma de células B2 (Bcl-2), proteína X asociada a Bcl-2 (Bax), creatinina sérica (Cr), factor de necrosis tumoral alfa (FNT-α) e interleucina 6 (IL-6). Resultados: Las ratas tratadas con naringina por isquemia-reperfusión renal mostraron un descenso significativo en los niveles de Cr, IL-6 y FNT-α en comparación con las ratas a las que se les indujo isquemia-reperfusión renal pero que no se les suministró naringina. La isquemia-reperfusión renal provocó un descenso de los niveles de Bcl-2 (1,72 ± 0,20 pg/ml) y un ascenso en los niveles de COX-2 (11882 ± 642 pg/ml), cPLA2 (2448 ± 139 pg/ml), ONSi (4331 ± 438 UI/ml), caspasa-3 escindida (7,33 ± 0,76 ng/ml) y Bax (2,33 ± 0.,44 ng/ml). El tratamiento con naringina diminuyó estos efectos en el riñón (7,47 ± 60,35 pg/ml; 9299 ± 327 pg/ml; 2001 ± 78 pg/ml; 3112 ± 220 UI/ml; 3.38 ± 0.54 ng/ml; 2.33 ± 0,44 ng/ml, respectivamente) (p <0,05). Conclusión: En este estudio se demostró que el tratamiento con naringina atenuó el daño renal producido por isquemia-reperfusión en ratas.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The efficacy of three different analgesic techniques during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy, including (i) periprostatic blockage (PPB), (ii) intrarectal gel instillation, and (iii) sedoanalgesia were compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During a period of five months, 100 consecutive men were enrolled in this study. A 10-point linear visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain scores during (VAS 1), immediately after (VAS 2) and one hour after (VAS 3) the needle biopsy procedure. The relationship between the level of pain, prostate volume, age and PSA was determined. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the four groups in terms of mean age and PSA values. The pain scores were significantly lower in sedoanalgesia and PPB groups (p = 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it was shown that patient comfort is better and it is possible to get decreased pain scores with PPB or sedoanalgesia. However, PPB is a preferable method in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy since it is much more practical in outpatient clinics.